Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Aste v. Metropolitan Life Insurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aste v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Anchor | green | “whether under federal rules or state law, there is no arbitration without a valid contract to arbitrate.” | 6 |
| 2 | Bahuriak v. Bill Kay Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. | green | “the issue of whether a contract to arbitrate exists must be determined by the court, not an arbitrator.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.