Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of New York v. State Division of Human Rights.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of New York v. State Division of Human Rights Anchor | green | “is supported by substantial evidence in the record” | 3 |
| 2 | Romanello v. Intesa Sanpaolo, S.p.A. | green | “thus, a proper . . . claim must be supported by substantiated allegations that, upon the provision of reasonable accommodations, the employee could perform the essential functions of his or her job, and the employee bears the burden of proof on this issue at trial” | 3 |
| 3 | New Venture Gear, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human Rights | green | “a reasonable accommodation is defined in relevant part as an action that permits an employee with a disability to perform his or her job activities in a reasonable manner” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.