Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 85 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Betts v. Costco Wholesale Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Betts v. Costco Wholesale Corp. Anchor | green | “there must be '(1) a clear error of law; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) an intervening change in controlling law; or (4) a need to prevent manifest injustice.” | 42 |
| 2 | Betts v. Costco Wholesale Corp. | green | “(1) a clear error of law; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) an intervening change in controlling law; or (4) a need to prevent manifest injustice.” | 17 |
| 3 | Brown v. Allen | green | “prejudice the occasional meritorious claim to be buried in a flood of worthless ones.” | 15 |
| 4 | Beverly Huff v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Elizabeth Huff | green | “the grant or denial of a rule 59(e) motion is within the informed discretion of the district court, reversible only for abuse.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.