Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 488 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State Ex Rel. Er.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Ex Rel. Er Anchor | green | “review the juvenile court's factual findings based upon the clearly erroneous standard.” | 135 |
| 2 | State Ex Rel. Br | green | “when a foundation for the court's decision exists in the evidence, an appellate court may not engage in a reweighing of the evidence.” | 101 |
| 3 | State Ex Rel. Br | green | “a foundation for the court's decision exists in the evidence,” | 67 |
| 4 | State Ex Rel. Br | green | “when a foundation for the juvenile court's decision exists in the evidence, an appellate court may not engage in a reweighing of the evidence.” | 59 |
| 5 | T.L.W. v. Office of the Guardian Ad Litem | green | “will not disturb the juvenile court's findings and conclusions unless the evidence clearly preponderates against the findings as made or the court has abused its discretion.” | 32 |
| 6 | State Ex Rel. Er | green | “wide latitude of discretion as to the judgments arrived at based upon not only the court's opportunity to judge credibility firsthand, but also based on the juvenile court judges' special training, experience and interest in this field.” | 18 |
| 7 | State Ex Rel. Er | green | “wide latitude of discretion as to the judgments arrived at' based upon not only the court's opportunity to judge credibility firsthand, but also based on the juvenile court judges' 'special training, experience and interest in this field” | 15 |
| 8 | State Ex Rel. Zd | green | “when a foundation for the court's decision exists in the evidence, an appellate court may not engage in a reweighing of the evidence.” | 15 |
| 9 | T.L.W. v. Office of the Guardian Ad Litem | green | “the court must next find that the best interests and welfare of the child are served by terminating the parents' parental rights.” | 14 |
| 10 | T.L.W. v. Office of the Guardian Ad Litem | green | “utah law requires a court to make two distinct findings before terminating a parent-child relationship.” | 14 |
| 11 | State Ex Rel. Raj | green | “first, the court must find that the parent is below some minimum threshold of fitness, such as a finding that a parent is unfit or incompetent based on any of the grounds for termination” | 9 |
| 12 | State in Interest of RAF | green | “a foundation for the court's decision exists in the evidence,” | 3 |
| 13 | State Ex Rel. Jd | green | “capable of bonding in a stable home despite their connection with” | 3 |
| 14 | In re G.J.C. | red | “the speculative possibility of father experiencing a dramatic transformation and providing a.c. with a positive, loving, nurturing relationship with his extended family must be weighed against father's real world actions as found by the court,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.