Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fuller v. Fuller.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fuller v. Fuller Anchor | green | “any misrepresentation ... can have relevance only if made to him or her.” | 3 |
| 2 | Fuller v. Fuller | green | “equitable estoppel to deny a duty to support a child can be invoked only upon a showing that there was an express or implied misrepresentation of fact inducing another to alter his position to his prejudice.” | 3 |
| 3 | Cooley v. Washington | green | “unless the party standing in loco parentis to the child means that it should continue.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.