Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ivey, Barnum & O'Mara v. Indian Harbor Properties, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ivey, Barnum & O'Mara v. Indian Harbor Properties, Inc. Anchor | green | “the court is obliged to assume the truth of the allegations contained in the defendant's special defense. . . .” | 5 |
| 2 | Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IV | green | “(1) whether the practice, without necessarily having been considered unlawful, offends public policy as it has been established by statutes, the common law or otherwise - whether, in other words, it is within at least the penumbra of some common law, statutory or other establish…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.