Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Garza v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garza v. State Anchor | green | “just as the timely filing of a notice of appeal vests the appellate courts with jurisdiction to consider the appeal, the timely filing of a petition for discretionary review vests this court with jurisdiction to review the judgment of the court of appeals.” | 3 |
| 2 | State Ex Relator McNamara v. Clark | green | “is the final arbiter of criminal law matters.” | 3 |
| 3 | Morrow v. Corbin | green | “includes the power of the trial court to determine either rightfully or wrongfully.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.