Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cockle v. Department of Labor & Industries.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cockle v. Department of Labor & Industries Anchor | green | “readily identifiable and reasonably calculable in-kind components of a worker's lost earning capacity at the time of injury that are critical to protecting workers' basic health and survival.” | 5 |
| 2 | Double D Hop Ranch v. Sanchez | green | “is to reflect a worker's lost earning capacity.” | 2 |
| 3 | Double D Hop Ranch v. Sanchez | green | “the purpose of time-loss compensation is to reflect a worker's lost earning capacity.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.