Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jason A.C. v. Lisa A.C..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jason A.C. v. Lisa A.C. Anchor | green | “allegations of bias are too speculative to warrant the conclusion that the jho abused his discretion in refusing to recuse himself here” | 3 |
| 2 | Witzigman v. Witzigman | green | “the record establishes that the jho was authorized only to hear the matter and issue a report inasmuch as the mother did not consent to the referral to the jho for a final determination on her petition” | 3 |
| 3 | Herald v. Herald | green | “where, as here, there is no allegation that recusal is statutorily required . . . , the matter of recusal is addressed to the discretion and personal conscience of the jho whose recusal is sought” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.