Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 84 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jeanne Connett v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Commissioner of Social Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeanne Connett v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Commissioner of Social Security Anchor | green | “we are constrained to review the reasons the alj asserts.” | 64 |
| 2 | Jeanne Connett v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Commissioner of Social Security | green | “constrained to review the reasons the alj asserts.” | 16 |
| 3 | Naomi Marsh v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “affirming the agency on a ground not invoked by the alj” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.