Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John M. O'Quinn, P.C. v. Natl Union Fire In.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John M. O'Quinn, P.C. v. Natl Union Fire In Anchor | green | “the applicability of any exclusions in the policy.” | 3 |
| 2 | John M. O'Quinn, P.C. v. Natl Union Fire In | green | “the insured bears the initial burden of showing that there is coverage, while the insurer bears the burden of proving the applicability of any exclusions in the policy.” | 3 |
| 3 | Aggreko, L.L.C. v. Chartis Specialty Ins. Co. | green | “and words and phrases contained therein should be given their plain and ordinary meaning.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.