Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Reilly's Wholesale Produce v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reilly's Wholesale Produce v. United States Anchor | green | “competition in contracting and ensuring a fair and effective process at the gao.” | 3 |
| 2 | Nortel Government Solutions, Inc. v. United States | green | “an agency may override an automatic stay if it notifies the gao in writing that either 'performance of the contract is in the best interests of the united states,' or 'urgent and compelling circumstances that significantly affect interests of the united states will not permit wa…” | 3 |
| 3 | URS Federal Services, Inc. v. United States | green | “congress has determined that the public interest is served by the imposition of an automatic stay to allow the gao an opportunity to ascertain the merits of a bid protest.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.