Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 85 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State ex rel. Dann v. Taft.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State ex rel. Dann v. Taft Anchor | green | “open government serves the public interest and our democratic system.” | 31 |
| 2 | State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton County | green | “is construed liberally in favor of broad access, and any doubt is resolved in favor of disclosure of public records.” | 21 |
| 3 | State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton County | green | “liberally in favor of broad access, and any doubt is resolved in favor of disclosure of public records.” | 13 |
| 4 | State ex rel. Dann v. Taft | green | “one of the salutary purposes of the public records law is to ensure accountability of government to those being governed.” | 9 |
| 5 | State ex rel. Caster v. Columbus (Slip Opinion) | green | “the relator must still establish entitlement to the requested extraordinary relief by clear and convincing evidence.” | 6 |
| 6 | State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-Kelley | green | “fall squarely within the exception.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.