Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. West.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. West Anchor | green | “although a hearsay objection was raised against this testimony, defendant at no time objected to this testimony on the specific ground that it constituted improper bolstering” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Burroughs | green | “as the people correctly contend, the prosecutor's cautionary instructions to the grand jurors, which forbade them from drawing any negative inferences from the shackling, 'were sufficient to dispel any potential prejudice' to defendant” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Medeiros | green | “because his convictions are supported by legally sufficient trial evidence, defendant's challenges to . . . the instructions given during the grand jury proceeding are precluded” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.