Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Prisoners' Legal Services v. New York State Department of Correctional Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prisoners' Legal Services v. New York State Department of Correctional Services Anchor | green | “all personnel records used to evaluate performance toward continued employment or promotion, under the control of any police agency or department . . ., shall be considered confidential and not subject to inspection or review without the express written consent of such police of…” | 3 |
| 2 | Prisoners' Legal Services v. New York State Department of Correctional Services | green | “is no longer employed by an agency has no bearing upon the question of whether the requested records were or were not used by that agency to evaluate his or her performance” | 3 |
| 3 | Capital Newspapers Division of Hearst Corp. v. City of Albany | green | “in litigation to harass, embarrass, degrade or impeach that officer's integrity,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.