Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Dillhunt.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Dillhunt Anchor | green | “still in the process of gathering information about the accident prior to taking any action” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Kelley | green | “in determining whether a defendant was in custody for miranda purposes, 'the test is not what the defendant thought, but rather what a reasonable person, innocent of any crime, would have thought had he been in the defendant's position” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Saunders | green | “merely investigatory and did not constitute custodial interrogation to which miranda is applicable” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.