Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Volpe v. Limoncelli.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Volpe v. Limoncelli Anchor | green | “even according full credit to the defendants' version of the accident, it was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact in light of the circumstances of the accident” | 3 |
| 2 | Byrne v. Calogero | green | “drivers have a duty to see what should be seen and to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances to avoid an accident” | 3 |
| 3 | Young v. City of New York | green | “when a driver approaches another vehicle from the rear, he is bound to maintain a reasonably safe rate of speed and to . . . compensate for any known adverse road conditions” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.