Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Federal Election Comm'n v. Ted Cruz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Federal Election Comm'n v. Ted Cruz Anchor | green | “for standing purposes, we accept as valid the merits of plaintiff's legal claims . . . .” | 5 |
| 2 | Laufer v. Acheson Hotels, LLC | green | “only question is, putting the merits aside, whether plaintiff plausibly alleges he was injured under his theory of the underlying legal claim.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.