Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 84 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles Anchor | green | “no longer controlling, or even viable.” | 27 |
| 2 | Pacific Radiation Oncology v. the Queen's Medical Center | green | “relief of the same character as that which may be granted finally.” | 14 |
| 3 | Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York Corporation | green | “analysis is substantially identical for the injunction and the tro” | 13 |
| 4 | American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles | green | “to the extent that our cases have suggested a lesser standard, they are no longer controlling, or even viable.” | 12 |
| 5 | Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc. | green | “no longer controlling, or even viable.” | 9 |
| 6 | Shell Offshore, Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc. | green | “if a plaintiff can only show that there are 'serious questions going to the merits' - a 10 lesser showing than likelihood of success on the merits - then a preliminary injunction may still 11 issue if the 'balance of hardships tips sharply in the plaintiff's favor, and the other…” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.