Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Columbia Casualty Co. v. Georgia & Florida Railnet, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Columbia Casualty Co. v. Georgia & Florida Railnet, Inc. Anchor | green | “and the same reasons that negate the duty to defend likewise negate any possibility that the indemnitor will ever have a duty to indemnify.” | 3 |
| 2 | Fresh Coat, Inc. v. K-2, Inc. | green | “something distributed or otherwise placed, for any commercial purpose, into the stream of commerce for use or consumption.” | 3 |
| 3 | Fresh Coat, Inc. v. K-2, Inc. | green | “a product is something distributed or otherwise placed, for any commercial purpose, into the stream of commerce for use or consumption.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.