Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. Securities and Exchange Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. Securities and Exchange Commission Anchor | green | “legislative history is problematic under the best circumstances, and even so reliable a source as the conference committee report may be used only when there is a genuine ambiguity in the statute.” | 5 |
| 2 | American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc. | green | “the act cannot be held to destroy itself.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.