Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State of South Dakota v. Hazen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State of South Dakota v. Hazen Anchor | green | “it is of no consequence that the controversy was live at earlier stages in this case; it must be live when we decide the issues.” | 5 |
| 2 | Sean Beck, by His Parent and Next Friend Marlene Beck v. Missouri State High School Activities Association, an Unincorporated Voluntary Association | green | “if this case is indeed moot, we must refrain from reaching the merits because any opinion issued would be merely 'advisory' and rest on hypothetical underpinnings.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.