Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Joan Marie DONOGHUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the COUNTY OF ORANGE; Dennis W. La-Ducer, Defendants-Appellees.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joan Marie DONOGHUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the COUNTY OF ORANGE; Dennis W. La-Ducer, Defendants-Appellees Anchor | green | “timely notice, lack of prejudice to the defendant, and reasonable and good faith conduct on the part of the plaintiff.” | 4 |
| 2 | Morcos S. Azer Doctor's Medical Laboratory, Inc. v. Kathleen Connell John Chen Steven Fujimori Joseph P. Munso Al Schaden | green | “federal law determines when a civil rights claim accrues.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.