Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp. Anchor | green | “the legislature has the power to define the circumstances under which a remedy is legally cognizable and those under which it is not.” | 5 |
| 2 | Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc. | red | “when the drafters wrote the oregon constitution in 1857, did the common law of oregon recognize a cause of action for the alleged injury?” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.