Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 83 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc. Anchor | green | “the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 39 |
| 2 | Golden Pacific Bancorp v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation | green | “may not rely on mere conclusory allegations nor speculation, but instead must offer some hard evidence showing that its version of the events is not wholly fanciful.” | 20 |
| 3 | Schultz v. Stoner | green | “each party's motion must be examined on its own merits, and in each case all reasonable inferences must be drawn against the party whose motion is under consideration.” | 13 |
| 4 | Nieblas-Love v. New York City Housing Authority | green | “required to resolve all ambiguities and draw all permissible factual inferences in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought,” | 6 |
| 5 | Golden Pacific Bancorp v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation | green | “the non-moving party may not rely on mere conclusory allegations nor speculation, but instead must offer some hard evidence showing that its version of the events is not wholly fanciful.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.