Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The Travelers Insurance Company v. 633 Third Associates.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Travelers Insurance Company v. 633 Third Associates Anchor | green | “looks to the decisional law of new york as well as to the state's constitution and statutes.” | 4 |
| 2 | Phansalkar v. Andersen Weinroth & Co. | green | “the job of the federal courts is carefully to predict how the highest court of the forum state would resolve the uncertainty or ambiguity.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.