Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 83 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alfredo Miranda v. County of Lake.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alfredo Miranda v. County of Lake Anchor | green | “with purposeful, knowing, or reckless disregard of the consequences” | 41 |
| 2 | Tapanga Hardeman v. David Wathen | green | “rationally related to a legitimate non-punitive governmental purpose” | 29 |
| 3 | Travis Williams v. Simeon Ortiz | green | “gauge objectively-without regard to any subjective belief held by the individual-whether the response was reasonable.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.