Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Oconomowoc Residential Programs, Incorporated v. City Of Milwaukee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oconomowoc Residential Programs, Incorporated v. City Of Milwaukee Anchor | green | “an accommodation is reasonable if it is both efficacious and proportional to the costs to implement it.” | 5 |
| 2 | Hemisphere Building Company, Inc. v. Village of Richton Park | green | “handicapped people by reason of their handicap, rather than ... by virtue of what they have in common with other people, such as a limited amount of money to spend on housing.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.