Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 82 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Susie J. Salter, as of the Estate of Salter, Rufus, Deceased v. The Upjohn Company, a Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susie J. Salter, as of the Estate of Salter, Rufus, Deceased v. The Upjohn Company, a Corporation Anchor | green | “it is very unusual for a court to prohibit the taking of a deposition altogether and absent extraordinary circumstances, such an order would likely be in error.” | 42 |
| 2 | United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. | green | “make a trial less a game of blind man's bluff and more a fair contest with the basic issues and facts disclosed to the fullest practicable extent.” | 21 |
| 3 | Ricardo Lozano v. Maryland Casualty Company, a Foreign Corporation | green | “the purpose of discovery is to provide a mechanism for making relevant information available to the litigants.” | 5 |
| 4 | Frideres v. Schiltz | green | “protective orders prohibiting depositions are rarely granted.” | 5 |
| 5 | National Life Insurance Company v. Hartford Accident And Indemnity Company | green | “the federal rules of civil procedure specifically give a party the right to question a witness by oral deposition.” | 3 |
| 6 | Bucher v. Richardson Hospital Authority | green | “particular and compelling need” | 3 |
| 7 | Naftchi v. New York University Medical Center | green | “protective orders prohibiting depositions are rarely granted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.