Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 82 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Weinberger v. Salfi.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weinberger v. Salfi Anchor | green | “exhaustion is generally required as a matter of preventing premature interference with agency processes, so that the agency may function efficiently and so that it may have an opportunity to correct its own errors, to afford the parties and the courts the benefit of its experien…” | 32 |
| 2 | Heckler v. Ringer | green | “both the standing and the substantive basis for the presentation” | 26 |
| 3 | Noernberg v. City of Brook Park | green | “it is a well-established principle of ohio law that, prior to seeking court action in an administrative matter, the party must exhaust the available avenues of administrative relief through administrative appeal.” | 5 |
| 4 | Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz | green | “neither an unreasoned statement in the manual nor allegedly longstanding agency practice can trump a formal regulation with the procedural history necessary to take on the force of law.” | 4 |
| 5 | Noernberg v. City of Brook Park | green | “prior to seeking court action in an administrative matter, the party must exhaust the available avenues of administrative relief through administrative appeal.” | 4 |
| 6 | Noernberg v. City of Brook Park | green | “party must exhaust the available avenues of administrative relief through administrative appeal” | 4 |
| 7 | Fairview General Hospital v. Fletcher | green | “only to circumvent an adverse decision of an administrative agency and to bypass the legislative scheme.” | 4 |
| 8 | Lydia B. Anderson v. Occidental Life Insurance Co. Of California, a Corporation | green | “because recovery would come from the federal treasury.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.