Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 82 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Keel v. Saul.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keel v. Saul Anchor | green | “harmless error exists when it is inconceivable that a different administrative conclusion would have been reached even if the alj did not err.” | 36 |
| 2 | Leslie Sun v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting Cmsnr | green | “conflicts of evidence are for the commissioner, not the courts, to resolve.” | 18 |
| 3 | Leslie Sun v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting Cmsnr | green | “even if it believes the evidence weighs against the commissioner's decision.” | 10 |
| 4 | Leslie Sun v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting Cmsnr | green | “substantial evidence is more than a scintilla, less than a preponderance, and is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 10 |
| 5 | Keel v. Saul | green | “when it is inconceivable that a different administrative conclusion would have been reached even if the alj did not err.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.