Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cerberus Partners, L.P. v. Gadsby & Hannah.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cerberus Partners, L.P. v. Gadsby & Hannah Anchor | green | “legal malpractice claims, transferred along with other assets and obligations to an assignee in a commercial transaction, are assignable.” | 3 |
| 2 | Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & Spivak | green | “allow the concept of the attorney-client relationship to be used as a shield by an attorney to protect him or her from the consequences of legal malpractice” | 3 |
| 3 | Thurston v. Continental Casualty Co. | green | “an intimate connection with the underlying lawsuit” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.