Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 81 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Montgomery v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montgomery v. State Anchor | green | “rarely and only after a clear abuse of discretion.” | 45 |
| 2 | Whitaker v. State | green | “a substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.” | 11 |
| 3 | Lopez v. State | green | “to preserve error, a complaining party must make a timely and specific request, objection, or motion and obtain an express or implied ruling on that request, objection, or motion.” | 9 |
| 4 | Daggett v. State | green | “i would never have sex with a minor” | 6 |
| 5 | Michelson v. United States | green | “the inquiry is not rejected because character is irrelevant; on the contrary, it is said to weigh too much with the jury and to so overpersuade them as to prejudge one with a bad general record and deny him a fair opportunity to defend against a particular charge.” | 5 |
| 6 | Daggett v. State | green | “unfortunately, courts frequently admit evidence of extraneous acts under the plan exception not to show acts the defendant took in preparation for the ultimate charged offense, but to show repeated acts that are similar to the charged offense.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.