Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Minard Run Oil Co. v. Pennzoil Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Minard Run Oil Co. v. Pennzoil Co. Anchor | green | “the owner of the servient tenement may make any use thereof which is consistent with or not calculated to interfere with the exercise of the easement.” | 5 |
| 2 | Mercantile Library Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co. | green | “the grant of a fee, subject to an easement, carries with it the right to make any use of the servient soil that does not interfere with the easement ....” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.