Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Rockford v. Unit Six of the Policemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Rockford v. Unit Six of the Policemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n Anchor | green | “a nonparty may be bound under privity if his interests are so closely aligned to those of a party that the party is the virtual representative of the nonparty.” | 5 |
| 2 | Mount Mansfield Insurance Group, Inc. v. American International Group, Inc. | green | “where a party has no standing to bring a cause of action on behalf of another party, either individually or derivatively, it also must be said to lack privity with the other party because it cannot adequately represent the other party's legal interests.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.