Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from USF&G CO. v. Omnibank.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | USF&G CO. v. Omnibank Anchor | green | “that ambiguous terms in an insurance contract are to be construed most strongly against the preparer, the insurance company.” | 4 |
| 2 | Caldwell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. | green | “the rule that the insurance policy prepared by the insurer must be construed more strongly against the insurance company, and that any fair doubt should be resolved in favor of the insured, is so well-settled in the law of insurance that we hesitate to cite any cases” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.