Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 473 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police Agent.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police Agent Anchor | green | “the absence of sufficient facts alleged under a cognizable legal theory.” | 221 |
| 2 | Rafael Navarro v. Sherman Block | green | “tests the legal sufficiency of a claim.” | 189 |
| 3 | Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police Agent | green | “dismissal can be based on the lack of a cognizable legal theory or the absence of sufficient facts alleged under a cognizable legal theory.” | 63 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.