Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Whiteside v. Tenet Healthcare Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whiteside v. Tenet Healthcare Corp. Anchor | green | “enforceability depends upon whether the terms of which the adherent was unaware are beyond the reasonable expectations of an ordinary person or are oppressive or unconscionable. ' "in dealing with standardized contracts, courts have to determine what the weaker contracting party…” | 4 |
| 2 | Dameron Hospital Ass'n v. AAA Northern California Nevada & Utah Insurance Exchange | green | “hospitals wish to preserve their right to recover the difference between usual and customary charges and the negotiated rate through a lien under the hla, they are free to contract for this right” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.