Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bon Supermarket & Deli v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bon Supermarket & Deli v. United States Anchor | green | “summary judgment is a proper means of disposing of a request for review under 7 u.s.c. 2023 (a)(13), where there are presented no genuine issues of material fact.” | 4 |
| 2 | Duchimaza v. United States | green | “whether the imposition of a penalty by the fns is arbitrary or capricious is a matter of law appropriately determined on a motion for summary judgment.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.