Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Libor-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Libor-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig. Anchor | green | “the second circuit has distilled rule 702's requirements into three broad criteria: (1) qualifications, (2) reliability, and (3) relevance and assistance to the trier of fact.” | 5 |
| 2 | TC Systems Inc. v. Town of Colonie, New York | green | “the admissibility of expert testimony should be viewed within the context of the entire rules of evidence and the presumption of admissibility of evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.