Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bonidy v. Vail Valley Center for Aesthetic Dentistry, P.C..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bonidy v. Vail Valley Center for Aesthetic Dentistry, P.C. Anchor | green | “an intention or desire to harm another usually seriously through doing something unlawful or otherwise unjustified' or 'revengeful or unfriendly feelings.” | 4 |
| 2 | Coors v. Security Life of Denver Insurance Co. | green | “where the defendant is conscious of his conduct and the existing conditions and knew or should have known that injury would result, the statutory requirements” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.