Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Estate of Arrowood v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estate of Arrowood v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services Anchor | green | “adduce evidence that makes the existence of a contested fact more likely than not.” | 4 |
| 2 | Ciotoli v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services | green | “believe that the existence of a fact is more probable than its nonexistence, before the special master may find in favor of the party who has the burden to persuade the special master of the fact's existence.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.