2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harris v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris v. State Anchor | green | “he search for intent is most accurately described as an effort to discern some general purpose, aim, or policy of the statute.” | 3 |
| 2 | Mustafa v. State | green | “our focus is, therefore, centered upon the statute's policy or purpose.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.