Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 80 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Williams v. Dept. of Corrections.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams v. Dept. of Corrections Anchor | green | “strike the proper balance between the security concerns of the prison, the need for swift and fair discipline, and the due-process rights of the inmates.” | 24 |
| 2 | McDonald v. Pinchak | green | “strike the proper balance between the security concerns of the prison, the need for swift and fair discipline, and the due-process rights of the inmates.” | 21 |
| 3 | Jenkins v. Fauver | green | “prison disciplinary proceedings are not part of a criminal prosecution, and the full panoply of rights due a defendant in such proceedings does not apply.” | 13 |
| 4 | Jenkins v. DOC | green | “we defer to an agency decision and do not reverse unless it is arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, or not supported by substantial credible evidence in the record.” | 6 |
| 5 | Balagun v. New Jersey Department of Corrections | green | “we will not perfunctorily review and rubber stamp the agency's decision,” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.