Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott Anchor | green | “in most cases, the state is willing to extend parole only because it is able to condition it upon compliance with certain requirements.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Donald Reyes, Robert Jubic | green | “on the court's continuum of possible punishments, parole is the stronger medicine; ergo, parolees enjoy even less of the average citizen's absolute liberty than do probationers” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.