Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 79 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Greek v. Colvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greek v. Colvin Anchor | green | “the alj is not permitted to substitute his own expertise or view of the medical proof for the treating physician's opinion or for any competent medical opinion.” | 43 |
| 2 | Hilsdorf v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “because an rfc determination is a medical determination, an alj who makes an rfc determination in the absence of supporting expert medical opinion has improperly substituted his own opinion for that of a physician, and has committed legal error.” | 36 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.