Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Illinois Central Railroad Company, Cross-Appellant v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Cross-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Illinois Central Railroad Company, Cross-Appellant v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Cross-Appellee Anchor | green | “could have left intact its award of prejudgment interest if it found 'other principles of law' which justified the award ...” | 4 |
| 2 | Bricklayers' Pension Trust Fund v. Taiariol | green | “section 1961 does not by its silence bar the awarding of prejudgment interest ...” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.