Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Roadway Express, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roadway Express, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board Anchor | green | “evidence is considered substantial if it is adequate, in a reasonable mind, to uphold the decision.” | 4 |
| 2 | National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service | green | “the board's application of the law to the facts is also reviewed under the substantial evidence standard, and the board's reasonable inferences may not be displaced on review.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.