Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from T.S. Falls, Sergeant Cummins Unit, Adc v. John Nesbitt.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T.S. Falls, Sergeant Cummins Unit, Adc v. John Nesbitt Anchor | green | “it is fundamental that prison administrators are accorded wide-ranging deference in the adoption and execution of policies and practices that in their judgment are needed to preserve internal order and discipline and to maintain institutional security.” | 4 |
| 2 | Willie Williams, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Michael P. Lane, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections | green | “in section 1983 cases, prisoners may receive remedies comparable to all civil litigants.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.