Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 79 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gray v. York Newspapers, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gray v. York Newspapers, Inc. Anchor | green | “a disputed fact is 'material' if it would affect the outcome of the suit as determined by the substantive law.” | 23 |
| 2 | Gray v. York Newspapers, Inc. | green | “is not significantly probative.” | 15 |
| 3 | M. S. v. Susquehanna Twp Sch Dist | green | “view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party” | 15 |
| 4 | Brenner v. Local 514, United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America | green | “genuine . . . if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 14 |
| 5 | Lawrence v. City of Philadelphia, Pa. | green | “the court must view all evidence and draw all inferences in the light most favorable to the non- moving party.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.